재규어 XE 수리 사례
X760 (2015-현재) · 2.0T AWD 자동
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 14. 작업
난이도 & 준비물
증상
maybe they aren't?just a thought....
처리 내용
Sway said: SpeckledJim said: Sway said: A Ghost is far more practical at the rear, and that's the middle ground between the Phantom (the limo option) and the Wraith (which is more comparable to this in terms of overall practicality, and is two door). Then, as per Jag wanting to make a "splash" with their first EV, RR chose to do the Spectre (again, similar rear practicality) as a two door. So there clearly is a cache. Ghost is more practical, granted. And as such the shape is a lot less exciting and a lot more conventional. Everything is a trade-off. If Type01 had the Ghost's silhouette and rear cabin space then we wouldn't be here talking about it with such energy. Why's it a big deal that they've chosen to make a dramatically styled and somewhat compromised saloon, instead of a dramatically styled and even more compromised coupe? Both come with upsides and downsides.I've mentioned before, but recognise it could well be my failing in ability - it's that the whole thing is singularly uncompromising for the exterior design, except for that one bit of adding extra doors. I just don't 'get it' - either truly go all in, or don't! What I would say is have a look at the interior of Spectre. The door aperture starts about 2" in front of the front edge of the rear seat base. So you fall backward into that seat and need to be fairly limber to get back out again.The door aperture on Type01 is positioned about halfway or 2/5s back on the rear seat base. Much easier to access, relatively-speaking.That's a design decision, made with the ultimate purposes of the vehicle in mind. There's no one right answer.If you have a fit and sexy gran then maybe Spectre is sufficiently practical to get her to Claridges for lunch. Happy days.But if your gran is moderately fat then maybe Spectre won't work and you need a Type01 instead. That said, if gran is bloody huge then maybe Type01 is also no good and you need a boring Ghost. Or a Peugeot Traveller?
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗재규어 XE 다른 정비 사례
mjspencer348 said: craigjm said: CDP said: That's what a Daimler DS420 is for. Maybe they should replace that?Maybe they should. They have said previously that one of the other cars is a two door coupe and been non-commital about what the third was going to ba apart from saying there wont be any crossover with Range Rover which kind of rules out an SUV but who knows. If they are going to do a two door 2+2 coupe then why not a convertible version, too? Seems logical.Yeah but then really its one car with three derivatives. Last time I was at a meeting where they were taking questions they wer
Quickmoose said: fooman said: I like the interior more than the new C class, less is moreYeah I don't mind it, super clean.Do away with the centre screen. Either have a centre tunnel flap that covers a screen with a small array of beautifully machined nobs and buttonsOr have a dock for you to plug your phone in, and replace that screen with your own. (like Bugatti did (?))Again it's a mission that's designe lead, but then pulls back from going alll in.Yes, some wonderfully tactile switchgear on the centre would have really helped.But every time I see that wheel and interior I think SD1.
mjspencer348 said: dinkel said: WTDMM said: But the doors would have to be about 7ft long and you'd never open them.AR got it right with the Cuore Rosso suicide doors option... And that's a way smaller car.I asked Google AI if you could develop a platform without a b-pillar, ie. with suicide doors and then use it for another model with a b-pillar and the verdict was no. Apparently, for side impact and rollover crash testing compliance a great deal more engineering has to go into the pillarless version in the rear hinge and door areas. I think that would've added further weight to a car that
dinkel said: WPA said: On what planet is this a practical solution, for what use these doors are they may as well not botheredWell, that was my point.But someone said this car is not about getting in: it's about the design.Yeah, right.Watch Harry’s Garage, he’s 6”4 and got in and out quite easily despite moaning his anti ev head off. It’s irrelevant. Nobody is buying or not buying these on the basis of rear seat ingress/egress. It’s highly retarded to even consider it
다른 차종의 엔진오일 교환 사례
차량 정보 없음
Hi everyone! Happy to join the community. I'm thinking about buying a fun weekend car soon. What do you personally prefer for pure driving enjoyment on weekends, manual or automatic? Looking forward to your opinions!
차량 정보 없음
Hi everyone! Happy to join the community. I'm thinking about buying a fun weekend car soon. What do you personally prefer for pure driving enjoyment on weekends, manual or automatic? Looking forward to your opinions!
르노코리아 QM6
Yes please as I've posted many times before. It'll be interesting to see how far the personalisation can go. I wonder if that will include quad motor?
차량 정보 없음
Fred Smith said: I genuinely pity people in modern cars, because they have spent 10 or 20 times what I did, only to have a much worse carWorse in what way?Are you again making the mistake of thinking that your subjective preferences are actually objective and universal?