재규어
엔진오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

재규어 XE 수리 사례

X760 (2015-현재) · 2.0T AWD 자동

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 10. 15. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 쉬움⏱ 예상 30~60분🔧 잭스탠드

증상

mjspencer348 said: craigjm said: CDP said: That's what a Daimler DS420 is for. Maybe they should replace that?Maybe they should. They have said previously that one of the other cars is a two door coupe and been non-commital about what the third was going to ba apart from saying there wont be any crossover with Range Rover which kind of rules out an SUV but who knows. If they are going to do a two door 2+2 coupe then why not a convertible version, too? Seems logical.Yeah but then really its one car with three derivatives. Last time I was at a meeting where they were taking questions they wer

처리 내용

J4CKO said: cerb4.5lee said: otolith said: WPA said: Easy to get in and out of you say I struggle to see why you are so keen to defend such a compromised design, rear access that will see you need to visit a chiropractor. if not careful.Rear access on a car this size should be much better, if not and design did have the final say you may as well make it a two door.You would find this easier?Its a good job you dont have a tiny sportscar like a Caterham or something, if you cant get in the back of this ?I dont feel like I am any less agile at 55 than I was 20 years ago really, I am sure I am but can still manage to get under the floor through the little trapdoor when the need arises and stuff like that.I'd be alright getting in, but getting out at my age now will be a test though I'd imagine. You're comparing a two door with a four door.Four door Bentleys are not as compromised.I would expect access to be easier if you've gone to the trouble of giving the car four doors.If the rear seats and access are merely a token gesture, why not just make the car a more attractive two door like the concept?

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

재규어 XE 다른 정비 사례

변속기 오일 교환2.0T AWD 자동

Quickmoose said: fooman said: I like the interior more than the new C class, less is moreYeah I don't mind it, super clean.Do away with the centre screen. Either have a centre tunnel flap that covers a screen with a small array of beautifully machined nobs and buttonsOr have a dock for you to plug your phone in, and replace that screen with your own. (like Bugatti did (?))Again it's a mission that's designe lead, but then pulls back from going alll in.Yes, some wonderfully tactile switchgear on the centre would have really helped.But every time I see that wheel and interior I think SD1.

변속기 오일 교환2.0T AWD 자동

mjspencer348 said: dinkel said: WTDMM said: But the doors would have to be about 7ft long and you'd never open them.AR got it right with the Cuore Rosso suicide doors option... And that's a way smaller car.I asked Google AI if you could develop a platform without a b-pillar, ie. with suicide doors and then use it for another model with a b-pillar and the verdict was no. Apparently, for side impact and rollover crash testing compliance a great deal more engineering has to go into the pillarless version in the rear hinge and door areas. I think that would've added further weight to a car that

엔진오일 교환2.0T AWD 자동

maybe they aren't?just a thought....

엔진오일 교환2.0T AWD 자동

dinkel said: WPA said: On what planet is this a practical solution, for what use these doors are they may as well not botheredWell, that was my point.But someone said this car is not about getting in: it's about the design.Yeah, right.Watch Harry’s Garage, he’s 6”4 and got in and out quite easily despite moaning his anti ev head off. It’s irrelevant. Nobody is buying or not buying these on the basis of rear seat ingress/egress. It’s highly retarded to even consider it

다른 차종의 엔진오일 교환 사례