2050년식 · 9YA (2017-현재) · 3.0 V6
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 8. 18. 작업
SpeckledJim said: ITP said: SpeckledJim said: ITP said: I think the issue is 100% EV. It should be just 70% or so, allowing manufacturers to produce vehicles in enough numbers to be viable to cater for things like caravan/boat towers and sports cars. Surely if 70% of vehicles are EV thats enough to save the world? Or does the extra 30% mean we ll all be underwater by 2050?By the time Johnny Boat-Tower needs to get a new EV, there will be EVs out there that will do the job he needs. Aaaaages yet.As for sportscars, new EV sportscars will be available. And old ICE sportscars will be available
127Sport said: ITP said: 127Sport said: ITP said: I think the issue is 100% EV. It should be just 70% or so, allowing manufacturers to produce vehicles in enough numbers to be viable to cater for things like caravan/boat towers and sports cars. Surely if 70% of vehicles are EV thats enough to save the world? Or does the extra 30% mean we ll all be underwater by 2050?Maybe. Is it worth the risk? What would be the point of allowing 30% of cars to be ICE? For what benefit? And is that benefit big enough to outweigh the contribution it would make to slowing the electrification of the country and attaining energy security? Why 30% anyway? What's your working on that, based on the benefits you believe it would bring, and which would outweigh the risk downside?That s a lot of questions.The 30% I just plucked from the air, could be 20, even 10. In fact I believe the eu has already rolled back to allow 10% not full EV.The benefit is we may get to have some exciting, lightweight sports car to enjoy into the future and not rely on increasingly aging classics. I think we already know there is little demand for EV sports cars. But if you aren t interested in cars and see a car as a to b, that goes right over your head I guess.But I don t believe if 70 or 80% of new cars are EV from 2035 onwards it will tip the world into crisis because it s not 100%. And no, I don t have a spreadsheet of projected climate data to back it up, but most of that kind of data over the last 30 years hasn t come true, sea levels, Maldives gone etc. I think we d be ok.It is a lot of questions, you seem to have avoided most of them and are leaving it up to "vibes". Nobody is buying lightweight sports cars any more, so that's not really a benefit either.10-20 years from now nobody is going to give a tuppenny toss about ICE cars for road use. Let it go.Eh? I answered most of your questions. Apart from the ‘slowing of electrification of the country’ one. Which is nonsense because if 70-80% were
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗Wow, £21000 of extras including Sport Electric soun…whatever that is. Porsche plan to add 20% to everything came early.
Wow, £21000 of extras including Sport Electric soun…whatever that is. Porsche plan to add 20% to everything came early.
kambites said: It's nice apart from the wheels. The 15/16 staggered setup on the original car was about perfect, IMO. The later 16/17 was OK too. This looks ridiculous. Agreed. A few years ago I saw Porsche 992 racers on 18", which looked ridiculous.So I asked why?Because they drive so much better on 18" sir.OK, I'll have a JAS Tensei NSX on 18" please...
Mikebentley said: I may be wrong but I believe they all have the same batteries. Could do with some nice leather too.Different batteries in RR/RRS to the Jaguar. Evo also seem to have their figures muddled up too - the average RR isn't £200k and in the latest magazine they say the Type 01 starts at under £100k and average £125k plus the weight is wrong. Not sure what's happened with their research.
재규어 XE
Love it
차량 정보 없음
윈드스크린 상단 잠금실린더에서 누유 발생. 실린더 재조립 후 유압액 충전했으나, 리어 데크리드가 열리는 지점까지 작동하다가 펌프가 힘들어하며 윙윙거리는 소음 발생.
차량 정보 없음
18,000km 전에 P0430으로 촉매 교체 후, MIL 꺼짐. 영구 코드: P0175 뱅크2 리치, P219B A/F 비율 실린더 밸런스, P0430 촉매 뱅크2. 새 A/F 센서 설치 후 코드 클리어. 시운전 중 뱅크2에서 연료 트림이 매우 음수로 나타남.
포르쉐 카이엔
kambites said: It's nice apart from the wheels. The 15/16 staggered setup on the original car was about perfect, IMO. The later 16/17 was OK too. This looks ridiculous. Agreed. A few years ago I saw Porsche 992 racers on 18", which looked ridiculous.So I asked why?Because they drive so much better on 18" sir.OK, I'll have a JAS Tensei NSX on 18" please...