S650 (2024-현재) · 2.3T EcoBoost 자동
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 9. 2. 작업
SDK said: Some hefty maintenance bills avoided by the sounds of it Acording to SDK's profile, the best climate change car was the Ford Puma 1.7.That appeared to be in use for 14 years, during which no replacement car pollution.Different now with the EVs.A new one is built for SDK after 4 years.Ignore pollution when each car is built, I need a new car.Polestar - prematurely disposed.
SDK said: Clad-Hach said: SDK said: Jon39 said: Acording to SDK's profile, the best climate change car was the Ford Puma 1.7.That appeared to be in use for 14 years, during which no replacement car pollution.Different now with the EVs.A new one is built for SDK after 4 years.Ignore pollution when each car is built, I need a new car.Polestar - prematurely disposed.After 3 years actually My old Polestar - that was sold used and is still going today The additional CO2 to build it was already 'paid back' before my 3 years using it was up and it's now running at around 40g CO2 per mile (with zero tailpipe pollution), Vs over 400g CO2 for an average ICE car (plus the TP pollution)So environmentally - the Polestar is doing extremely well 40g of CO2...Did you take into account the CO2 emitted to produce and install all the solar panels and the wind turbines, the maintenance of them and the cost of the new substations and transmission lines to deliver your electricity.Nobody mentions this.I also didn't account for building and maintenance of fossil fuel assets either.The building of renewables and transmission lines benefits everyone in the UK, it doesnt just go into EV's [It's not 'my' electricity, it's everyone's ] It's extremely hard to justifying an argument against the benefits of the changes happening!Cope much !Edited by SDK on Tuesday 1st September 11:21 What you mean the very same fossil fuels that generate the electricity to power your car when the sun doesn't shine or the wind doesn't blow...but the stupid electric net-zero tarrif's still have to be paid by all of us normal car drivers.Do we even need electric cars..???, we have never needed them in the past so why all of a sudden now.
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗"Yes, that looks really good""Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?""Dammit..."
"Yes, that looks really good""Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?""Dammit..."
"Yes, that looks really good""Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?""Dammit..."
All due respect to the current Puma, which is a decent car that drives well, but there is only one in my eyes.I had a Mk1 Puma 1.7 in Moondust Silver when I was 21 as my daily car. I loved how it drove and went everywhere in it, and the car was sort of part of the reason my partner & I got together. I ended up selling it to move on to something else, as we usually do at that fickle age, but I've always hankered after another.I've viewed many Puma's that have promised to be amazing, only to be let down by predictable corrosion (a notable one being a 9k mile example a few years ago that had a fi
재규어 XE
Love it
차량 정보 없음
윈드스크린 상단 잠금실린더에서 누유 발생. 실린더 재조립 후 유압액 충전했으나, 리어 데크리드가 열리는 지점까지 작동하다가 펌프가 힘들어하며 윙윙거리는 소음 발생.
차량 정보 없음
18,000km 전에 P0430으로 촉매 교체 후, MIL 꺼짐. 영구 코드: P0175 뱅크2 리치, P219B A/F 비율 실린더 밸런스, P0430 촉매 뱅크2. 새 A/F 센서 설치 후 코드 클리어. 시운전 중 뱅크2에서 연료 트림이 매우 음수로 나타남.
포르쉐 카이엔
kambites said: It's nice apart from the wheels. The 15/16 staggered setup on the original car was about perfect, IMO. The later 16/17 was OK too. This looks ridiculous. Agreed. A few years ago I saw Porsche 992 racers on 18", which looked ridiculous.So I asked why?Because they drive so much better on 18" sir.OK, I'll have a JAS Tensei NSX on 18" please...