포르쉐
엔진오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

포르쉐 카이엔 수리 사례

9YA (2017-현재) · 3.0 V6

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 8. 21. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 쉬움⏱ 예상 30~60🔧 잭스탠드

증상

SpeckledJim said: PAUL.S. said: The S1 LM was penned by an outsider working on behalf of the guy who commissioned the batch of 5, so realistically the road S1 has little to do with Gordon or his in house team other than making it a production reality, and cashing in.You can understand why the current owners need to produce these kind of cars but it's not really the ethos in which GMA was founded, it does feel like a bit of a sell out. Going forward it can only be expected that Gordons input gets watered down more and more until the company is a generic supercar company, with no race pedigree

처리 내용

SpeckledJim said: flemke said: Your example of five McMansions in a small street is not analogous because the shortage is natural and unavoidable. My objection is to artificial shortages cynically contrived to squeeze the market.Re McLaren games, I agree. Some years ago I got into a row with McLaren about that. The CEO at the time declared publicly, and the company confirmed privately, that they absolutely, positively would make no more than 500 675 LTs and they would be only coupes. After they had received customer deposits for all 500 cars, they surprised us by announcing the 675 LT spider, of which they ended up making more than 500 additional cars. I made my dissatisfaction sufficiently clear that they invited me down to MTC where they admitted that, at the senior level, that had been the plan all along and they apologised. More recently there has been intense competition over allocations for W1s, W1 spiders, and 788 LTs, a scramble which has been quite unedifying. For a long time Porsche did not indulge in the artificial limit thing but now they do it as well. Scarcity is part of market value, but is unrelated to intrinsic value. I consider artificial scarcity to be a form of market manipulation. I am glad that it is legal because, relative to other issues, banning it would add almost nothing to the public interest, but that doesn't mean that I have to approve of it. In most instances lying is also legal. I wouldn't make it illegal, but I don't have to like it. It may be the case, in the jousting between company and market, that if you placed an expensive car on 'unlimited' sale, that you could sell 50 of them. That being just how many people wanted one at the stated price, within the given terms.But if you made it a limited edition of 60, then you might be able to sell them all. Ten people who didn't want one when there could conceivably end up being 500 of them out there are persuaded to buy the 51st-60th examples, because the guaranteed scarcity is an addi

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 엔진오일 교환 사례