9YA (2017-현재) · 3.0 V6
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 8. 7. 작업
Every day a journey said: I don't want to understand their range. I understand cars and have always loved decent ones.I could not tell the difference between 80% of McLarens as they bore me to tears. The Speedtail was an interesting oddity. That's about it.You ought to try and get a drive or fast passenger ride in one, then you'd understand. Like a grown up Elise with power.
200Plus Club said: 100% , one is a carbon bodied supercar with gullwing doors , the other will look like any of the thousands of other 911 out there at that price point. This ^ Serial Porsche 911 owner here (albeit, I went from 964 as far as 997, and then went back to the older stuff again)Someone recently posted a picture of their new 992 Turbo on PH (in what can only be described as a Marmite hue)I was struck by two things : How big, bloated and dull it looked, but also how downright ugly it was. A couple of days later I had the misfortune to see the same model car on the road, and far from thinking how much better it looked in the flesh (in white) I just thought how hideous the modern 911 Turbo now looks.I'd take the McLaren every time over a modern 911, because, to use a profane statement :"Why is a 911 like a cli***is ? Because every c****'s got one"So, carbon tubbed, mid-engined, British-built supercar, built in tiny numbers (compared with those Porsche produce annually) or another fat, ugly bloated 911 ?I'd chance my arm with the 540C and leave the servicing and maintenance to Thorney Motorsport.
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗Wow, £21000 of extras including Sport Electric soun…whatever that is. Porsche plan to add 20% to everything came early.
Wow, £21000 of extras including Sport Electric soun…whatever that is. Porsche plan to add 20% to everything came early.
kambites said: It's nice apart from the wheels. The 15/16 staggered setup on the original car was about perfect, IMO. The later 16/17 was OK too. This looks ridiculous. Agreed. A few years ago I saw Porsche 992 racers on 18", which looked ridiculous.So I asked why?Because they drive so much better on 18" sir.OK, I'll have a JAS Tensei NSX on 18" please...
Mikebentley said: I may be wrong but I believe they all have the same batteries. Could do with some nice leather too.Different batteries in RR/RRS to the Jaguar. Evo also seem to have their figures muddled up too - the average RR isn't £200k and in the latest magazine they say the Type 01 starts at under £100k and average £125k plus the weight is wrong. Not sure what's happened with their research.
차량 정보 없음
I haven't checked i have Ron240's permission to post but here goes.Make in one but took two to get correct modelEdited by Mr-Ecosse on Sunday 11th October 13:36
차량 정보 없음
An extra win for good measure!
차량 정보 없음
Gompo said: Still Mulling said: CanAm said: Are you sure that's a 4C?Motoring quiz Cardle said they look like this!I was about to post that! (Bloomin Cardle has gone to the dogs! (Chunter chunter grr ))I've never played Cardle, but I know who took the photo of the 4C/Starlet. Do I get a bonus point?Please bestow upon me several whoosh parrots...
차량 정보 없음
mcpoot said: One but showing the model name in the pic always helps. It's not really a help if cannot be read and made sense of.