사고 차량 점검PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

사고 차량 점검 수리 사례

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 8. 17. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 보통⏱ 예상 60~180분🔧 전용 진단기

증상

housemouse said: Hard not to sense there s a big crash coming. All these ultra high end cars. We ve been here before.+1

처리 내용

BigChiefmuffinAgain said: Phobos50 said: biggbn said: Phobos50 said: JJJ. said: Phobos50 said: JJJ. said: Never considered the original F1 as a great looking car and the same goes for this. A touch of Italian design flair might have helped. Regardless, this is just the epitome of a toy for the boys that can afford it, nothing more imo. It's possibly even an irrelevance in annuals of supercar history I'd take a T.33 given the choice.Obviously personal opinions, but i think the F1 (and now the S1) are the best looking cars ever. Period. And definitely not needing Italian design flair. I love some Italian designs - the 33 Stradale and LP400 Countach would be be near the top for me, but the F1 is the GOAT for me. T33 is stunning though.GOAT you say? There is only one and that's the Miura, compromises and all. Then again as we've said, it's only personal opinions at the end of the day. Mind, I'd happily have a Stradale too. I try and judge cars on physical viewing, not just photos - i've never seen a 33 Stradale or T33, admittedly, but when i saw my first Miura, i was underwhelmed. When i saw my second Miura, it just didn't do anything for me, personally. I fully appreciate its historical importance though and how many other people love it. Yes - F1 GOAT for me.Not a fan of Miura or F1...and as much as I'd love to explain in detail WHY, I probably can't. Sometimes you either like things or you don't.Fair point. I agree - its a connection. An emotional response. First time i saw an F1 was on the cover of Autocar 3rd June 1992. I knew i'd just seen the best looking car i'd ever see (my opinion obviously). 34 years later, my opinion hasnt changed.Don't suppose you can post the article about the 52 mpg Metro. Now THAT would be interesting.....Edited by Phobos50 on Monday 17th August 10:46

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 사고 차량 점검 사례

토요타

토요타 캠리

Winter 1993. On my way to the office, I'm slightly distracted by changing the music or something and I don't notice the rush hour traffic has come to a halt - I brake hard but manage to hit the Fiesta. The driver in the 7 series in front of the Fiesta hears the impact and instantly stands on the brake but inadvertently floors the throttle and careers over the road, hits the opposite fence, spins around, hits the fence on this side, then comes to a halt. His car was less than a month old.....I manage to get away with 3 points for driving without due car and a big old slice of humble pie. Ca

차량 정보 없음

작년 11월 후방 충돌 사고 후 보험사 지정 정비소에서 수리를 받았으나 문제 발생. 테일게이트가 리어 범퍼와 간섭(바인딩)이 생기고 도장 품질도 만족스럽지 않음. 정비소 방문해 사전에 의견을 전달했으나 개선되지 않음.

차량 정보 없음

작년 11월 후방 추돌 사고 이후 보험사 지정 정비소에서 수리했으나 문제 발생. 테일게이트가 후방 범퍼와 간섭(바인딩) 현상 발생, 도장 품질도 미흡함. 수리 전 정비소 방문해 산업 경험자임을 알렸으나 개선되지 않음.

차량 정보 없음

Hi all,Just had my AA policy renewed. (Member 35 years)In the Renewal pack, there was a leaflet pushing their "Accident assist" scheme.They say, if you have a bump, use them, NOT my insurance company (LV) because:-No policy excess to pay UP FRONTVehicle recovery by the AALifetime guarantee on repair workmanshipLike for like car provided, (If not at fault)THEY will deal with the insurance companies.I am free to choose my repairer.Personally, I would rather deal with my own insurer who have a first class reputation. This seems to be going around the houses, and LV might not like them being invol