볼보
변속기 오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

볼보 S40 수리 사례

2008년식 · 2세대 (2004-2012) · 2.4 기본형

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 7. 31. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 보통⏱ 예상 60~120🔧 리프트

증상

Ciid said: So, do you think GM should develop a specific platform for Saab or lend Saab the RWD platforms of US brands? What should GM have done?If they were taking things seriously then yes a decent platform should have been developed from scratch for SAAB and shared with whichever domestic brands they were pretending to be "premium".Look at the mileage the Ford PAG group ended up getting of the EUCD platform, which itself came from the P2 platform that Volvo developed. GM were always thinking how they could do the absolute least, no long term thinking, just hubris. Who else, besides maybe

처리 내용

GeniusOfLove said: If they were taking things seriously then yes a decent platform should have been developed from scratch for SAAB and shared with whichever domestic brands they were pretending to be "premium".Look at the mileage the Ford PAG group ended up getting of the EUCD platform, which itself came from the P2 platform that Volvo developed. GM were always thinking how they could do the absolute least, no long term thinking, just hubris. Who else, besides maybe Rover, would try to launch a premium product into a sector full of increasingly capable competitors, and base it on a 6 year old mediocre cheap family car?As for what GM should have done, they should have done exactly what they've done since 2008 and concern themselves with making trucks to sell to their captive domestic market and leave the business of making internationally competitive cars to better companies.Edited by GeniusOfLove on Thursday 30th July 17:13 "The Better Company" was bankrupt, which is why it was bought by GM...Saab was too small a brand (selling just over 100,000 units per year all over the World) to monetize the development of its own platform, which costs billions of dollars.That would be unsustainable from a financial point of view.The first gen Volvo S40 used a platform from the Mitsubishi Carisma and engines from Renault and was a sales success.The Ford EUCD platform has nothing to do with Volvo's P2 platform, which was developed before Ford acquired Volvo. The Ford EUCD is actually an extended version of the Ford C1, which was the basis for the Ford Focus.Before being bought by Ford, Volvo Cars wasn't exactly profitable, and the Volvo Group (which was focused on the manufacture of heavy vehicles) tried several times to sell it or merge it with other manufacturers. You don't understand that it's very difficult to make a European car manufacturer profitable if it's not German.It was during the GM era that Saab sold the most in its history. Therefore, GM immensely helped Saab

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 변속기 오일 교환 사례