사브 9-5 수리 사례

2026. 7. 27. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

증상

carinaman said: The 900NG was GM based, by that time SAAB didn't have sufficient funds or profitability to develop they're own platform. Look at the Tipo Quattro 9000/Thema/Croma/164, SAAB were having to share platforms before the 900NG I think the Top Gear piece on the demise of SAAB said that GM gave them the platform for the 9-5 thinking scales of economy, reduced costs but that didn't work as SAAB then spent so much turning into a SAAB.SAAB are very much still going strong. it’s just that the cars aren’t. The cars were just a middle part of Svenska Aeroplan Aktibolaget’s life.

처리 내용

SkodaIan said: Boo-urns said: finlo said: Wasn't it just a rebadged cheapo Tata that they chanced their arm on hoping nobody noticed?Yup. Not a good look when you're trying to salvage the reputation of a dying brand. It wasn't cheap either, at least to begin with.I'd argue that the MG SV and the ZT V8 probably contributed more to finishing off MG Rover than the CityRover. Instead of spending money developing a successor to the ageing mass market "hot hatch" ZR and ZS (which were actually pretty good and sold fairly well), a lot of effort was put into developing niche "halo" cars which would never sell in any quantity even if they were good.The plug being pulled on the R30 project was probably the first nail in the coffin, not getting the R50 Mini (after showing it to Rover dealers complete with Rover badges) was probably the biggest. After those there wasn't any money to develop replacements for the 25/45 and the RWD 75 models and SV were cheap to produce vehicles they hoped would bring additional revenue in. The City Rover a last throw of the dice when they had no money and knew they were dying