푸조
변속기 오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

푸조 3008 수리 사례

2026년식 · E3008 (2024-현재) · 일렉트릭 AWD

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 9. 24. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 보통⏱ 예상 60~120분🔧 리프트

증상

The ride, packaging and range aren’t attractive even if cute looks might be. I accept most journeys are short but most buyers of new vehicles hope to make occasional trouble free longer journeys x times a year.I think we’ll just have to wait a bit longer for better mainstream ordinary bespoke EV platforms from Eurocentric brands to come online. Which is a shame as it feels like we’ve been waiting an age as it is.The Polo/Raval etc are going to be a step up from these Stellantis offerings which in reality are converted and quite dated ICE platforms that have been breathed over to get something

처리 내용

Peugeot 205 GTi 1.6 was launched in 1984 making the time gap between it and E-208 42 years. Using that logic, trying to compare a 205 to a E-208 is like trying to compare a Peugeot 202 to a 205.In 1942, cars were mechanical, low-horsepower wartime transport with around 35-40hp engines, separate steel chassis and mechanical leaf springs. In 1984, 205 GTi was a high-revving, lightweight petrol icon of the hot-hatch boom with more than double the power of a 202. Today's E-208 is a heavy, silent, software-defined electric vehicle with more than double the power of a 205. These 42-year gaps span an entirely different technological epoch every time. I don't think badge/model continuity should mean mechanical continuity nor any real comparative validity when they all come from three completely different eras of human engineering.I find it all somewhat pointless when crash safety laws, structural weight, and the definition of what a car is has changed so fundamentally over the last 84 years that any comparison is pretty meaningless. The typical car buying public of 2026 simply would not contemplate purchasing a 205 just as they wouldn't contemplate purchasing a 202.

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 변속기 오일 교환 사례

BMW

BMW 5시리즈

Alex_225 said: mercedeslimos said: I did a change on a buddy's 5G-Tronic on Saturday; it hadn't been done in 136k miles. To say the drive improved was putting it mildly. I've got my Phaeton with the 6HP to do soon, a bit more involved as a job, but it's already had a box and a torque converter in the last 50k, so it hasn't been left forever without maintenance - I've heard the 6HP19s seem to like to give trouble! It's my first torque converter auto (in 70 cars of manuals, and 1 DSG!)If I'd kept my old E320cdi I'd have certainly ended up getting the gearbox serviced. I bought it with 104k on

볼보

볼보 V60

볼보 V60(ZB) | 오일 교환 | 공정1: 전회 38,300km 필터 교환 완료, 금회 41,000km 필터 교환 완료, ATF 교환, 와이퍼 고무 교환, 콘솔 커버 교환(실비), 브레이크 불량의 원인 미파악 상태로 반납됨

차량 정보 없음

DKS said: Stuart70 said: Unless I am due a parrot, the 9-3 was based on a Vectra / Cavalier platform, not an Astra? The Mk3 Astra and Cavalier are so similar (especially at the front) that only a true car nerd would know or care, but the Saab has an Astra rear beam, clear as day. The GTE's beam would fit right on for example, and the way the handbrake cables work are the same. A Cavalier sort of uses a single cable, Astra/ Saab uses one for each wheel. But then Saab added 5mm spacers each side at the rear, to make it the same as a Cavalier....It's very odd.Well I for one have learnt somethin

토요타

토요타 캠리

닛산 스카이라인 GT-R(R33) 트랜스퍼 오일 교환 - 트랜스퍼 드레인에서 누유 발생, 교환 필요