총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 8. 14. 작업
I was wondering about this the other day. Is the petrol usage in the car only influenced by the position of the gas pedal? So for example if I take my foot of the gas and coast for 30 seconds, would that be the same petrol consumption as sitting idle in traffic for 30 seconds? Or if If I'm driving through a slow zone with the gas pedal 30% depressed, over a minute would that be the same gas consumption as driving on a motor way in top gear with the gas pedal at 30% depressed? Do slopes / hills have an influence? Assuming I'm driving up a slope in a high gear with the gas pedal in a constant po
Lots of things influence fuel consumption, actual pedal position being probably the strongest. The engine's rotational speed has SOME influence, but not nearly as much as pedal position... and a lot of the reason that the engine's speed has influence is because ignition timing will be different at different engine speeds (among other secondary influences), and ignition timing also influences fuel consumption. Coasting, with the transmission shifted to neutral is exactly equivalent - in terms of fuel volume per unit time - to idling. Coasting with the transmission engaged is less efficient than idling because of compression braking. Slopes DO have some minor influence, because slopes alter engine speed (engine speed falls on upslopes, rises on downslopes), but GENERALLY if you hold the pedal exactly fixed (or just use a once-common accelerator lock) fuel consumption on downslopes should be very similar to fuel consumption on upslopes. Too, fuel pressure falls off slightly on upslopes, a
출처
이 사례는 Stack Exchange (미국)에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗BMW 5시리즈
Alex_225 said: mercedeslimos said: I did a change on a buddy's 5G-Tronic on Saturday; it hadn't been done in 136k miles. To say the drive improved was putting it mildly. I've got my Phaeton with the 6HP to do soon, a bit more involved as a job, but it's already had a box and a torque converter in the last 50k, so it hasn't been left forever without maintenance - I've heard the 6HP19s seem to like to give trouble! It's my first torque converter auto (in 70 cars of manuals, and 1 DSG!)If I'd kept my old E320cdi I'd have certainly ended up getting the gearbox serviced. I bought it with 104k on
볼보 V60
볼보 V60(ZB) | 오일 교환 | 공정1: 전회 38,300km 필터 교환 완료, 금회 41,000km 필터 교환 완료, ATF 교환, 와이퍼 고무 교환, 콘솔 커버 교환(실비), 브레이크 불량의 원인 미파악 상태로 반납됨
차량 정보 없음
DKS said: Stuart70 said: Unless I am due a parrot, the 9-3 was based on a Vectra / Cavalier platform, not an Astra? The Mk3 Astra and Cavalier are so similar (especially at the front) that only a true car nerd would know or care, but the Saab has an Astra rear beam, clear as day. The GTE's beam would fit right on for example, and the way the handbrake cables work are the same. A Cavalier sort of uses a single cable, Astra/ Saab uses one for each wheel. But then Saab added 5mm spacers each side at the rear, to make it the same as a Cavalier....It's very odd.Well I for one have learnt somethin
토요타 캠리
닛산 스카이라인 GT-R(R33) 트랜스퍼 오일 교환 - 트랜스퍼 드레인에서 누유 발생, 교환 필요