X760 (2015-현재) · 2.0T AWD 자동
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 4. 작업
pycraft said: "ere have been rumours previously that Jaguar would forgo the use of a conventional rear screen in favour of a digital rearview mirror. Whether or not all of this could be said to ‘recapture the ethos of founder Sir William Lyons to Copy Nothing’ is, of course, still open to rampant speculation."Well, the screenless rear (and digital mirrors) looks a lot like the back of an Avatr 12. It's a good-looking car, but hardy "copy nothing".... and the Polestar 4
Honeywell said: Go woke go broke. What's the point of Jaguars USP when any old Chinese EV maker can give you a super smooth 500bhp car with effortless torque and eery refinement for under £50 grand? When Tesla gives you much the same with the added benefit of a luxury charging network? Would it just be beauty?That's about the only thing they could possibly conjure as a point of difference but I doubt they can comply with a myriad of technical parameters for a global car AND make something gorgeous looking. The only way of making something quite different would be to not package the battery as a skateboard and that would make the car handle like a pig.They have no proprietary battery tech and can't reinvent the electric motor. They've decimated their local dealer network and the wider JLR group have a poor reputation for reliability and build standards. The Ingenium engine is possible the worst engineered power plant of this century. Their flagship product is best known for being able to be stolen anywhere anytime. I wish it were not so as many of my customers work in the broader Solihull economy but the writing is on the wall, Going down in a splash of desperate wokeism is just an undignified way to die,What does "Go woke, go broke" actually mean? Let's start with the word 'woke' which appears to be a lazy term used by intolerant right-wingers to describe anything they disagree with. Now, are there any companies that of gone broke because of 'going woke'?
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗Seems legitAI filling in:Via carspyshots.netEdited by Galego on Tuesday 6th October 10:44
I have a feeling this is a fake. Apart from the window anomaly mentioned earlier, I cannot believe they would allow the final launch cars to have the shonky fit and finish shown in the images.There was some 'influencer' event a few months ago that alowed them to sit in an example. The car had badly fitting interior bits and I wonder if this was used to create these images.
Seems legitAI filling in:Via carspyshots.netEdited by Galego on Tuesday 6th October 10:44
Seems legitAI filling in:Via carspyshots.netEdited by Galego on Tuesday 6th October 10:44
차량 정보 없음
This looks fantastic. I think it's got to a point you'd have to be daft to buy the G90 M5 over this or a top end Taycan. Either pure combustion or pure electric, the PHEVs are just a pointless, overcomplicated middle option
혼다 시빅
Still as subtle as a brick in your face. Not for me.
차량 정보 없음
Other than a slightly bulky rear end, I think that looks fantastic. 9/10. And it's a saloon, not another bloody SUV - hurrah!
혼다 시빅
Still as subtle as a brick in your face. Not for me.