S650 (2024-현재) · 2.3T EcoBoost 자동
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 8. 1. 작업
So, the debate is rumbling on. Top Gear effectively died when Clarkson had to be sacked. But even at that stage both he ( and the programme) had descended into self parody. Every dog has its day. For those with a long memory, it went from boring , to interesting to stupid and puerile.
Blib said: INeedAHero said: Some of the stuff was brilliant although they stopped doing it. The carvan hating was awesome. They played conkers with caravans, jumped caravans using a bus IIRC.Robin Reliant as space shuttleRoad races using various modes of transportThe StigVarious odd track days, the one where there there are 2 drivers, one doing the steering and other doing the brake and gasThis was all before the world of YouTube and influences trying to get attention. Yes it did get tiresome towards the end and needed another direction but if it was that easy it would have been done by now. It's a difficult segment to fill.Oh. Very. Dear.If only it had 'seperated'. It's a pity that they didn't have the resources to go again with that particular escapade. Robin Reliant!. It's not a Focus Ford nor is it a Robin Reliant.
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗"Yes, that looks really good""Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?""Dammit..."
"Yes, that looks really good""Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?""Dammit..."
"Yes, that looks really good""Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?""Dammit..."
All due respect to the current Puma, which is a decent car that drives well, but there is only one in my eyes.I had a Mk1 Puma 1.7 in Moondust Silver when I was 21 as my daily car. I loved how it drove and went everywhere in it, and the car was sort of part of the reason my partner & I got together. I ended up selling it to move on to something else, as we usually do at that fickle age, but I've always hankered after another.I've viewed many Puma's that have promised to be amazing, only to be let down by predictable corrosion (a notable one being a 9k mile example a few years ago that had a fi
차량 정보 없음
2000 911 996 클램셸 모터 설치 중 모터 샤프트가 트랜스미션 케이블과 정렬되지 않음. 저항을 6.2로 설정했으나 클램셸을 서비스 위치(최대 후진)에 놓았을 때도 정렬 문제 발생.
BMW 5시리즈
Alex_225 said: mercedeslimos said: I did a change on a buddy's 5G-Tronic on Saturday; it hadn't been done in 136k miles. To say the drive improved was putting it mildly. I've got my Phaeton with the 6HP to do soon, a bit more involved as a job, but it's already had a box and a torque converter in the last 50k, so it hasn't been left forever without maintenance - I've heard the 6HP19s seem to like to give trouble! It's my first torque converter auto (in 70 cars of manuals, and 1 DSG!)If I'd kept my old E320cdi I'd have certainly ended up getting the gearbox serviced. I bought it with 104k on
볼보 V60
볼보 V60(ZB) | 오일 교환 | 공정1: 전회 38,300km 필터 교환 완료, 금회 41,000km 필터 교환 완료, ATF 교환, 와이퍼 고무 교환, 콘솔 커버 교환(실비), 브레이크 불량의 원인 미파악 상태로 반납됨
차량 정보 없음
DKS said: Stuart70 said: Unless I am due a parrot, the 9-3 was based on a Vectra / Cavalier platform, not an Astra? The Mk3 Astra and Cavalier are so similar (especially at the front) that only a true car nerd would know or care, but the Saab has an Astra rear beam, clear as day. The GTE's beam would fit right on for example, and the way the handbrake cables work are the same. A Cavalier sort of uses a single cable, Astra/ Saab uses one for each wheel. But then Saab added 5mm spacers each side at the rear, to make it the same as a Cavalier....It's very odd.Well I for one have learnt somethin