볼보
μ—”μ§„μ˜€μΌ κ΅ν™˜PistonHeadsβ˜… 신뒰도 4.1 (λ†’μŒ)

볼보 S40 수리 사둀

2μ„ΈλŒ€ (2004-2012) Β· 2.4 κΈ°λ³Έν˜•

총 λΉ„μš©

-

κ³΅μž„

-

λΆ€ν’ˆλΉ„

-

μ†Œμš” μ‹œκ°„

-

2026. 7. 27. μž‘μ—…

λ‚œμ΄λ„ & μ€€λΉ„λ¬Ό

λ‚œμ΄λ„ 쉬움⏱ μ˜ˆμƒ 30~60λΆ„πŸ”§ μž­μŠ€νƒ λ“œ

증상

cherryowen said: Crook said: Same 80 goodness but no roofI think this would make a nice summer runabout.That looks lovely and VFM to bootIt looks lovely and is giving me itches for a car I don't need but want -one of the best looking saloon chopped cars ever, if not the best. I'm not sure it's that cheap though, it feels more like a Β£2,500 car but happy to be corrected.

처리 λ‚΄μš©

GeniusOfLove said: I am always surprised so many people think the P2 Volvos feel "really solid" I always found them to have a very wobbly shuddery rattly feel to them too, the first Volvos I every drove that had that "feel" to them were the (rather underrated) C1 platform S40/V50/C30/C70 which felt properly modern while the P2 cars felt very much like they came from the 90s.My man! I've been arguing that for years. Had a few P2 V70s and all were underwhelming, felt quite 'loose' to drive and seemed to have quite a few rattles and creaks yet some people absolutely think they're peak Volvo I still maintain, the Ford era stuff... specifically the V50 and P3 V70s... seem to wear their miles better and drive so much better. Granted they're not with issues but resilience to abuse DND drivability, they're better. I know you get good and bad examples of any car but previous V50 and V70 have been at 230k, 210k, 200k, 250k and wife currently has an R-Design with 180k and driving it, it's silent, everything works and the seats are like new.P2 stuff at that miles looked and felt like every one of their miles had been done as an Egyptian taxi...

좜처

이 μ‚¬λ‘€λŠ” PistonHeadsμ—μ„œ μˆ˜μ§‘ν•œ λ°μ΄ν„°μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€.

신뒰도 4.1점(λ†’μŒ) β€” 좜처 μ†ŒμŠ€μ˜ μ „λ¬Έμ„±/검증ꡬ쑰λ₯Ό κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ μ‚°μ •λœ 점수이며, 정확성을 보μž₯ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.

원문 보기 β†—

볼보 S40 λ‹€λ₯Έ μ •λΉ„ 사둀

μ—”μ§„μ˜€μΌ κ΅ν™˜2.4 κΈ°λ³Έν˜•

정속 μ£Όν–‰ 쀑 μ•½κ°„μ˜ 덜컹거림 λ°œμƒ. 엔진이 μˆœκ°„μ μœΌλ‘œ μ—°λ£Œ 곡급을 μžƒμ—ˆλ‹€κ°€ λ‹€μ‹œ λ“€μ–΄μ˜€λŠ” 것 같은 λŠλ‚Œ. κ³„κΈ°νŒμ—λŠ” ν‘œμ‹œλ˜μ§€ μ•ŠμŒ. 저속 μ£Όν–‰ μ‹œ, 특히 감속할 λ•Œ 진동 λ°œμƒ.

μ—”μ§„μ˜€μΌ κ΅ν™˜1.9 κΈ°λ³Έν˜•

Volvo S40 1999, 2.0 μ—”μ§„. 유휴 μƒνƒœμ—μ„œ μ—°λ£Œ μ••λ ₯ 2.2-2.3 bar (정상 2.5), κ³ RPMμ—μ„œ μ΅œλŒ€ 2.6-2.7 bar (정상 3.0). μ—°λ£Œ μ••λ ₯ λ ˆκ·€λ ˆμ΄ν„°μ—μ„œ μΈν…Œμ΄ν¬ λ§€λ‹ˆν΄λ“œλ‘œ κ°€λŠ” 호슀 뢄리 μ‹œ μ••λ ₯이 2.9 bar둜 μƒμŠΉ. μˆœμ • Walbro μ—°λ£Œ νŽŒν”„, μ—°λ£Œ μ••λ ₯ λ ˆκ·€λ ˆμ΄ν„°, μ—°λ£Œ ν•„ν„°, 인젝터 μ”° ꡐ체함. μ—°λ£Œ νŽŒν”„ λ¦΄λ ˆμ΄λŠ” μ—†κ³  νŽŒν”„λ₯Ό μ œμ–΄ν•˜λŠ” μ‹œμŠ€ν…œ 릴레이 있음 (확인됨). μ‹œμŠ€ν…œ λ¦΄λ ˆμ΄λ„ ꡐ체함. 컀λ„₯ν„° μ²­μ†Œ, μ—°λ£Œ 라인 μƒνƒœ μ–‘ν˜Έ. λΆ€ν’ˆ ꡐ체에도 λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  κ°œμ„  μ—†μŒ.

브레이크 νŒ¨λ“œ κ΅ν™˜2.4 κΈ°λ³Έν˜•

2007 Volvo S40 μžλ™λ³€μ†κΈ°. 브레이크 νŽ˜λ‹¬μ΄ μ£Όν–‰ 쀑 λ•Œλ•Œλ‘œ λ°”λ‹₯κΉŒμ§€ 내렀감. 특히 정체 쀑 ν™œλ°œν•œ λΈŒλ ˆμ΄ν‚Ή μ‹œ λ°œμƒν•˜λ©° κ³ μ†λ„λ‘œ 고속 μ£Όν–‰ 쀑에도 λͺ‡ 번 λ°œμƒ. νŽ˜λ‹¬ 이동 거리의 처음 40-50%μ—μ„œλŠ” λΈŒλ ˆμ΄ν¬κ°€ μž‘λ™ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ” κ²ƒμ²˜λŸΌ 보이닀가 이후 λΈŒλ ˆμ΄ν‚Ήλ˜μ§€λ§Œ 정상 μž‘λ™ μ‹œμ™€λŠ” 닀름. 정상 μ‹œμ—λŠ” μ•½ 20% νŽ˜λ‹¬ μ΄λ™μœΌλ‘œ μ¦‰μ‹œ μ •μ§€ λŠλ‚Œ. 졜근 μ°¨λŸ‰μ΄ λ¦¬ν”„νŠΈμ— μ˜¬λΌκ°”μ—ˆμŒ. ABS 경고등이 λ¦¬ν”„νŠΈ μƒνƒœμ—μ„œ μ λ“±λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€κ°€ 지면에 λ‚΄λ €μ˜¨ ν›„ μ†Œλ“±λ¨.

배터리 κ΅ν™˜2.4 κΈ°λ³Έν˜•

볼보 S40 λ””μ € - μΈμ μ…˜ νŽŒν”„ ꡐ체 ν›„ μ‹œλ™ λΆˆλŸ‰. μ‹œλ™μ΄ 잘 μ•ˆ 걸리고 μ—¬λŸ¬ 번 ν¬λž­ν‚Ήν•΄μ•Ό 겨우 μ‹œλ™λ¨. 배터리 μ „λ ₯을 많이 μ†ŒλΉ„ν•¨. 쀑고 μΈμ μ…˜ νŽŒν”„ μž₯μ°© ν›„ λ°œμƒ.

λ‹€λ₯Έ μ°¨μ’…μ˜ μ—”μ§„μ˜€μΌ κ΅ν™˜ 사둀

볼보 S40 μ—”μ§„μ˜€μΌ κ΅ν™˜ 수리 사둀 | MechanicHub