머플러 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

머플러 교환 수리 사례

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 9. 13. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 보통⏱ 예상 60~120🔧 리프트🔧 특수공구

증상

monkfish1 said: The supercharger is a non issue in my view. However, highlift cams will be if there is increased overlap as these will create significantly elevated emmisions. Which is exactly what the original Euro x changes were designed to prevent. You have chosen to circumvent those requirements, so i guess you may have a problem. Personally id wait it out and see if it passes whatever comes. Did you change the cats as well? Most aftermarket cats wont come close to cleaning up the exhaust compared to an OE cat.I guess worse case there would be the option to take back to a standard spec or

처리 내용

ITP said: otolith said: Depends on the details of the implementation, but in principle if the car is not dirtier than when it was registered, that should be ok. The most basic thing they might do is to tighten the MOT limits for newer cars to what they should reasonably have achieved out of the factory. I don t think that would be a problem for a contemporary engine swap with cats. Yes, it will depend on how flexible the tester is allowed to be.I m guessing the reg and the chassis VIN are the same as when new, just a different engine number logged on the V5 for the V6.But how will any electronic box filling govt system the tester may have to log into account for that? The engine number will be from a car (reg and VIN) that doesn t exist any more and I m sure a 3.0V6 will be dirtier than the from new 1.8, and it will be modified from installation in the donor.So unless you are doing a like for like engine swap for a failed engine, or the car is pre 2001 it could be a problem.You are going in way to deep. Nobody is going to check all that stuff. It will either meet the revised emmisions test, or it wont. No one will care what engine is fitted, so long as it passes the test. And as we dont know what exactly the test will be, its rather pointless discussing the finer detail.

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 머플러 교환 사례

미쓰비시 아웃랜더

미쓰비시 파제로(V80/90계) | 차검 전 정비 | DPF 자동 재생 시간이 비정상적으로 길거나 경고등이 점등/점멸됨. 4WD 경고등도 함께 점등. 진단기 연결 후 원인 불명. 배기 인젝터 세척 및 연료 필터 교체 작업 중 가스켓이 역으로 설치되어 있고 홀을 절반 막고 있었음. 가스켓에 반달 모양의 스트(카본) 적착.

차량 정보 없음

I get how these things are very much a personal thing, but IMO seeing that much exhaust pipework on show makes it look unfinished, lacking a proper rear valance, or something.

차량 정보 없음

엔진 경고등이 빗올 때 자주 켜짐. 최근까지는 코드가 메모리에 저장되지 않았으나, 마지막 진단 시 P0420 코드 발생. 2006년식 차량, 주행거리 10만 마일. 산소 센서는 교체한 적 없음. 엔진 경고등이 켜져도 차량 성능 변화 없음.

차량 정보 없음

nickfrog said: njw1 said: nickfrog said: ^ sounds good to me if that helps prevent absurdly noisy exhausts or bypass emission mitigation. We have collectively made a rod for our own back by taking the mickey.One of the cars listed in your garage has one of the loudest cold starts I've ever heard!True and it's annoying. It only lasts a few seconds however and it's a surprisingly quiet car in Comfort which is the only mode I would use in town.When I traded my 2018 M3 for the Alpine the dealer commented that it was the loudest car on their plot and by a country mile. A definite boom as it star