2024년식 · B9 (2015-현재) · 35 TFSI
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 7. 28. 작업
SpudLink said: cerb4.5lee said: Mr Tidy said: I'd rather be walking than getting in that lardy white monstrosity!I don't think it's white, but I'm colour blind to be fair! Either way, I can understand why folk don't like either of them though in fairness. The small car is too small, and big car is too big arguably for me. I don t think the Smart is too small. I do think it s a silly looking thing with stupid proportions. The JLR product will be better in every way, but is unnecessarily big for most users most of the time. Certainly in UK urban environments. I had a Smart EV once as a loan
havoc said: Wheelspinning said: We went the Range Rover route after my wife was involved in a non fault serious RTC with 2 of our kids then aged 2 and 9 mths; after that she wanted to be in something bigger and feel safer.The picture of the Range Rover sport next to the yellow smart indicates which vehicle i would prefer to be in if someone ploughs into you at speed, like in the instance of my wife and kids.And there is the perfect example of game-theory in action on our roads - "I want to be safe, fk everyone else".Sure, in the (statistically VERY*) unlikely event of a major accident, it'll be the better choice, but for the remaining 99.99995% of ownership it'll be too big to park easily, too wide to get down narrow roads easily, more expensive to buy, more expensive to run and more likely to inconvenience other road (& car park) users. * 1 KSI every c.10+ million vehicle-miles in 2024, and 1 reported injury every c.2 million vehicle-miles in 2024. If you and your wife do 20k miles between you each year (i.e. 50% above UK average), you'd both have to drive for 50 years to have a 50/50 chance of an injury-reportable accident, and 250 years to have a 50/50 chance of a serious-injury accident. As with a conversation on another thread a few months back, people are very bad at judging real risk / probabilities.And let us not forget that a larger vehicle comes with issues such as longer to stop, wider, less manoeuvrable, higher CoG and more likely to flip over, and the all time classic of worse driving as you think you are safer...And we already know that something like a Range Rover is far far worse for pedestrians - and we know that large SUV's are more likely to kill their own kids while manoeuvring ( https://www.leedsscp.org.uk/driveways ).So yeah. I am not convinced any SUV is 'safer'...
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗휠 교체 시 적합한 휠을 찾는 방법을 알고 싶음. 차트에 여러 행이 있는 이유를 이해하지 못함. 위 목록에서 아무거나 선택할 수 있는지, 19인치 림의 경우 선택지가 1개만 있는지 확인 필요. 사람과 짐 아이콘의 의미 파악 필요.
부품 번호를 찾을 수 있는 프로그램이 있는지 궁금합니다. 또는 아우디에서 일하시는 분이 몇 가지 보디 부품의 부품 번호를 찾아주실 수 있는지 알고 싶습니다. DM 부탁드립니다.
Mr E said: there can t be any 100hp-per-litre cars from history we wouldn t all at least want to drive, if not own outright I submit the e120 Toyota Corolla T-Sport. 1.8 litres. 190bhp. Nobody cared. Or the Honda Integra XSI, first mass production n/a car with 100bhp/litre, just a pity it didn't look like it.
14' Audi S4 B8.5의 리어 브레이크 패드 교체 시 웨어 센서(마모 센서) 정보를 찾을 수 없음. 프론트 패드에는 센서가 있었는데 리어 패드에도 있는지 확인 필요.
차량 정보 없음
골드 색상 때문에 문제가 생김
차량 정보 없음
이 차의 디자인이 매우 노후화된 상태
재규어 XE
A neighbour had one of these and I used to love hearing him start it up in the morning (he also had a V Twin Buell which was even noisier). Top bloke.
차량 정보 없음
RizzoTheRat said: Yeah both of those are off motorway, some of the motorway ones we passed in the Netherlands yesterday were 2.60 or morePricey in parts of Germany too. I never thought I’d be relieved to see UK fuel prices again.