총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 7. 17. 작업
I'll apologize in advance for a fuzzy question. My problem consists of two parts. For starters, I'm trying to buy a DC engine for learning purposes and most of them only specifies the watt (which I can use in order to convert and get the horse power that I'm normally used to) or torque. And secondly, I've never built something like this before, usually I build bikes or cars. Normally engines are pre-designed to haul a car or two but when it comes to DC engines I could accidentally buy something that's meant to drive a overhead crane. What torque would be required to match your run-of-the-mill
This is a great vehicle dynamics question that essentially has two parts to it: Is the motor able to hit top speed, 120 mph? Is the torque enough to accelerate it to top speed within 5 seconds? The motor in question Power : 1000 W (~ 1.36 hp) Speed : 3200 RPM Torque : 1.91 Nm Something interesting to note here is the apparent discrepancy between the three quantities. Since the three quantities are related, one could back-calculate how much power is delivered by the quoted torque at 3200 RPM: Power = Torque x Angular Speed = 1.91 Nm x ( 2π / 60 x 3200 RPM ) 1/s = 640 W So clearly, something is up with the manufacturer's claimed figures . For 1000 W output at 3200 RPM, the required torque should be around 3 Nm, not 1.91 Nm. However, errare humanum est , so we'll stick with the generous 1000 W for the rest of this answer. So what does 1000 W buy? In short, not much. The aerodynamic drag force alone, in the absence of other parasitic factors such as rolling resistance, inclinations and hea
출처
이 사례는 Stack Exchange (미국)에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗토요타 캠리
Winter 1993. On my way to the office, I'm slightly distracted by changing the music or something and I don't notice the rush hour traffic has come to a halt - I brake hard but manage to hit the Fiesta. The driver in the 7 series in front of the Fiesta hears the impact and instantly stands on the brake but inadvertently floors the throttle and careers over the road, hits the opposite fence, spins around, hits the fence on this side, then comes to a halt. His car was less than a month old.....I manage to get away with 3 points for driving without due car and a big old slice of humble pie. Ca
차량 정보 없음
작년 11월 후방 충돌 사고 후 보험사 지정 정비소에서 수리를 받았으나 문제 발생. 테일게이트가 리어 범퍼와 간섭(바인딩)이 생기고 도장 품질도 만족스럽지 않음. 정비소 방문해 사전에 의견을 전달했으나 개선되지 않음.
차량 정보 없음
작년 11월 후방 추돌 사고 이후 보험사 지정 정비소에서 수리했으나 문제 발생. 테일게이트가 후방 범퍼와 간섭(바인딩) 현상 발생, 도장 품질도 미흡함. 수리 전 정비소 방문해 산업 경험자임을 알렸으나 개선되지 않음.
차량 정보 없음
Hi all,Just had my AA policy renewed. (Member 35 years)In the Renewal pack, there was a leaflet pushing their "Accident assist" scheme.They say, if you have a bump, use them, NOT my insurance company (LV) because:-No policy excess to pay UP FRONTVehicle recovery by the AALifetime guarantee on repair workmanshipLike for like car provided, (If not at fault)THEY will deal with the insurance companies.I am free to choose my repairer.Personally, I would rather deal with my own insurer who have a first class reputation. This seems to be going around the houses, and LV might not like them being invol