총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 6. 작업
Other than a slightly bulky rear end, I think that looks fantastic. 9/10. And it's a saloon, not another bloody SUV - hurrah!
Bluehorseshoe said: The IM5 Performance is nearly as quick for under half the money, and the Polestar 5 wins on power, torque, battery size and build.Stats copied from a table made in Ai show Polestar then MGPolestar 5 PerformanceMG IM5 PerformancePower884 hp741 bhpTorque749 lb ft592 lb ft0-62mph3.1s3.2sTop speed155mph166mphWeight2,500kg2,298kgBattery112kWh, 800V100kWh gross (96.5kWh net)Range346 miles356 milesEfficiency2.9mi/kWhabout 3.7mi/kWh (27kWh/100mi)10-80% charge22 mins (350kW max)17 mins (max kW not confirmed)Price£104,950from £48,495Straight-line speed: The Polestar has 143hp and 157 lb ft more, but it is also about 200kg heavier. The result is only a 0.1s advantage to 62mph.Efficiency: The MG is clearly more efficient, so it gets slightly more range from a smaller battery. The two range figures may not be measured the same way, so treat that gap loosely.Charging: The MG's 10-80% time is quicker on paper, even though the Polestar has the higher 350kW peak.Price: The Polestar costs £56,455 more, over double the MG's price. That money buys the extra power, bigger battery, and premium build and brand rather than much real-world pace.The IM5 figures are UK-market numbers from several sources that don't fully agree, for example top speed is quoted as 166 or 167mph.Sources: Fleet News IM5 Performance, Encycarpedia IM5 Performance, CarscoopsBasically the above highlights an expensive EV often does little a cheaper one won't. Both are nice looking saloons but if i was paying I would take the MG as an example and then buy a second thing...(this is not how life actually works but you get the idea)I recently test drove a MG IM5 and IM6.They are good cars for the lower value end, but nothing like this P5, which is several steps up in size and luxury.E.g. I couldn’t get the DAB radio to work in both the IM5 & 6 and it seems an issue in UK, for a long time already.
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗혼다 시빅
Still as subtle as a brick in your face. Not for me.
혼다 시빅
Still as subtle as a brick in your face. Not for me.
차량 정보 없음
This looks fantastic. I think it's got to a point you'd have to be daft to buy the G90 M5 over this or a top end Taycan. Either pure combustion or pure electric, the PHEVs are just a pointless, overcomplicated middle option
차량 정보 없음
So after the disappointment of buying a 2017 Infiniti Q70 with reasonably low miles...https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&......that was supposed to be reliable and cost effective motoring.I have gone full circle and purchased a 2011 Volvo V70 SE with the 2.0D 5 cyl engine on 147k miles.However...I think..I hope...I have got lucky.2 owners from new, the last being 9 years.The car is extremely clean in and out and underneath is excellent.It has mountains of service history (every year) and has just been serviced one week ago. It has had 2 cambelt changes (one recently) and a new c